نبذة عن البحث باللغة العربية - Abstract:
العلاقة التكاملية بين الوعي الصوتي والطلاقة القرائيّة:
وجهات نظر معلمي الصف الأول الأساسي في المدارس اللبنانية
د. حنان مالك حلبي *
تعالج هذه الدراسة ذات المنهج المختلط العلاقة التفاعلية المتبادلة بين الوعي الصوتي والطلاقة القرائيّة لدى تلامذة الصف الأول الأساسي في المدارس اللبنانية، وذلك من وجهة نظر معلمي الصفوف. فتسعى الدراسة إلى استقصاء ما إذا كان الوعي الصوتي والطلاقة القرائية يؤثر كلٌّ منهما في الآخر بصورة متبادلة، وما إذا كان التدريس الصوتي الفعّال يسهم في تعزيز قدرات التلامذة في الوعي الصوتي.
اعتمدت الدراسة عينة قصدية مؤلفة من 40 معلمًا ومعلمة للصف الأول الأساسي من المدارس الرسمية والخاصة في مختلف المناطق اللبنانية، ضمن تصميم تتابعي تفسيري للمنهج المختلط. جُمعت البيانات الكمية من خلال استبيان مكوّن من 15 فقرة وفق "مقياس ليكرت"، تلاه إجراء مقابلات شبه منظّمة مع عدد من المشاركين المختارين، بهدف تعميق فهم النتائج الكمية وتفسيرها بصورة أشمل. وقد أظهرت التحليلات الإحصائية الوصفية والاستدلالية، بما في ذلك اختبارات الثبات، وتحليل التباين (ANOVA)، والانحدار المتعدد، وجود علاقات إيجابية ذات دلالة إحصائية بين مكوّنات الوعي الصوتي والطلاقة القرائية. كما بيّنت النتائج أن الاستراتيجيات الصوتية الفعّالة تُحدث أثرًا كبيرًا في تنمية الوعي الصوتي لدى التلامذة (p < 0.001)، وأن الوعي الصوتي يُعدّ متنبئًا قويًّا بمستوى الطلاقة القرائية.
تبرز نتائج الدراسة الأهمية البالغة لدمج التدريس الصوتي المنهجي ضمن مناهج تعليم القراءة في الصف الأول الأساسي، والحاجة إلى تطوير مهني مستمر للمعلمين في مجال استراتيجيات الوعي الصوتي المبنية على الأدلة العلمية. وقد ناقشت الدراسة دلالات هذه النتائج بالنسبة إلى منسّقي المناهج، ومصممي التعليم، والمعلمين في الصفوف، مع تقديم توصيات عملية على مستوى السياسات التربوية والممارسات التعليمية في السياق اللبناني.
- الكلمات المفتاحية:
المدرسة اللبنانية؛ الوعي الصوتي؛ الطلاقة القرائية؛ معلمو الصف الأول الأساسي
***
- Abstract:
This mixed-methods study investigates the symbiotic relationship between phonological awareness and reading fluency among Grade 1 students in Lebanese schools from the perspectives of classroom teachers. This research examines whether phonological awareness and reading fluency demonstrate reciprocal influence and whether effective phonological instruction enhances students' phonological awareness capabilities. A convenience sample of 40 Grade 1 teachers from public and private schools across Lebanon participated in this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. Quantitative data were collected through a 15-item Likert-scale questionnaire, followed by semi-structured interviews with selected participants to provide deeper insights into the quantitative findings. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, including reliability testing, ANOVA, and multiple regression, revealed significant positive relationships between phonological awareness and reading fluency components. Results demonstrated that effective phonological strategies significantly impact students' phonological awareness development (p < 0.001), and that phonological awareness strongly predicts reading fluency outcomes. The findings underscore the critical importance of integrating systematic phonological instruction into Grade 1 literacy curricula and highlight the need for teacher professional development in evidence-based phonological awareness strategies. Implications for curriculum coordinators, instructional designers, and classroom practitioners are discussed, with recommendations for policy and practice in Lebanese educational contexts.
- Keywords:
Lebanese school; Phonological awareness; Reading fluency; Grade One Teachers
***
* د. حنان مالك حلبي: باحثة وأكاديمية لبنانية. أستاذة مساعدة في كلية التربية – الجامعة اللبنانية. حائزة شهادة دكتوراه في العلوم التربية من جامعة القديس يوسف (بيروت).
* Dr. Hanan Malek Halabi: Lebanese researcher and academic. Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Pedagogy – Lebanese University. She holds a PhD in Educational Sciences from Saint Joseph University (Beirut).
References
- Abou-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and Writing, 13(1-2), 147-157.
- Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.
- Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255-259.
- Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., & Burgess, S. R. (2003). Phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 470-487.
- Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.
- Bahous, R., Bacha, N. N., & Nabhani, M. (2011). Multilingual educational trends and practices in Lebanon: A case study. International Review of Education, 57(5-6), 737-749.
- Birsh, J. R. (Ed.). (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
- BouJaoude, S., & Ghaith, G. (2006). Educational reform at a time of change: The case of Lebanon. In J. Earnest & D. Treagust (Eds.), Education reform in societies in transition: International perspectives (pp. 193-210). Sense Publishers.
- Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403-414.
- Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91(1), 77-111.
- Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5-51.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 139-167.
- DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
- Diab, R. L. (2006). University students' beliefs about learning English and French in Lebanon. System, 34(1), 80-96.
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
- Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167-188.
- Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., &
- Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Irvington.
- Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
- Foorman, B. R., & Moats, L. C. (2004). Conditions for sustaining research-based practices in early reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 25(1), 51-60.
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.
- Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.
- Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.
- Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.
- Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.
- LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
- Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5-55.
- Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., Anthony, J. L., & Barker, T. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 294-311.
- Lonigan, C. J., Schatschneider, C., & Westberg, L. (2008). Identification of children's skills and abilities linked to later outcomes in reading, writing, and spelling. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 55-106). National Institute for Literacy.
- Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322-352.
- Moats, L. C. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 379-399.
- Moats, L. C. (2010). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
- Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665-681.
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Government Printing Office.
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
- Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford University Press.
- Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33(3), 283-319.
- Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
- Rasinski, T. V., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350-361.
- Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 431-451.
- Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265-282.
- Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119-129.
- Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
- Shaaban, K. A., & Ghaith, G. (2002). University students' perceptions of the ethnolinguistic vitality of Arabic, French and English in Lebanon. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(4), 557-574.
- Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218.
- Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
- Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407.
- Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307-342). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7-26.
- Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In S. A.
- Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192-212.
- Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 468-479.
- Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143.
- Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3-29.
الحداثة (Al Hadatha)
ربيع 2026 Spring
العدد: 239 ISSUE
مجلد: 33 .Vol
ISSN: 2790-1785

ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق