Batoul Ibrahim SALAMEH *
- نبذة عن البحث باللغة العربية - Abstract:
تأثير الروبوت التعليمي على الإبداع العلمي لدى طلاب الصف الثامن
(دراسة على مدرسة خاصة في بيروت)
يهدف هذا البحث إلى دراسة تأثير دمج نادي الروبوت التعليمي على الإبداع والمواقف العلمية لدى طلاب الصف الثامن من الذكور في مدرسة خاصة في بيروت (لبنان). يستخدم البحث تصميم شبه تجريبي- قبل الاختبار وبعده، شمل 100 طالب مقسمين بالتساوي بين مجموعة تجريبية ومجموعة ضابطة. تم جمع البيانات من خلال تقييمات الإبداع العلمي والمواقف العلمية، بالإضافة إلى مقابلات نصف مُنظمة استنادًا إلى اختبار المواقف العلمية المتعلقة بالعلوم (TOSRA)، استمر التدخل لمدة ثمانية أسابيع، وتم تحليل البيانات باستخدام برنامج SPSS وتحليل المحتوى.
تكشف نتائج البحث عن تحسن ملحوظ في الإبداع العلمي في المجموعة التجريبية، على الرغم من عدم وجود فرق بارز في بُعد الأصالة. وتظهر كلا المجموعتين تحسينات في المواقف العلمية، لكن المجموعة التجريبية حققت تعزيزًا أكبر في الإبداع. ويلحظ البحث أن الروبوتات لها تأثير إيجابي على الإبداع العلمي والمواقف العلمية لدى الطلاب، موصيًا بدمجها في التعليم، وإجراء المزيد من البحوث مع عينات أكبر وأكثر تنوعًا، لتأكيد النتائج.
- الكلمات المفتاحية: التعليم في لبنان؛ الروبوت التعليمي؛ الإبداع العلمي؛ التوجه العلمي.
***
- Abstract: The study examines the impact of integrating an educational robotics club on the creativity and scientific attitudes of 8th-grade boys at a private school in Beirut, Lebanon. The research used a quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test design, involving 100 students divided equally between an experimental group and a control group. Data was collected through assessments of scientific creativity and scientific attitudes, along with semi-structured interviews based on the Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA). The intervention lasted for 8 weeks, and data were analyzed using SPSS and content analysis. The findings revealed a significant improvement in scientific creativity in the experimental group, although no notable difference was found in the originality subdimension. Both groups showed improvements in scientific attitudes, but the experimental group had a greater enhancement in creativity. The study concluded that robotics positively influenced students' scientific creativity and attitudes, recommending its integration into education and further research with larger, more diverse samples to confirm the results.
- Keywords: Education in Lebanon; educational robotics; scientific creativity; scientific attitude.
***
* بتول إبراهيم سلامي: باحثة لبنانية. تحوز شهادة ماستر بحثي في تكنولوجيا التربية- كلية التربية (الجامعة اللبنانية) موضوع الرسالة البحثية: "تأثير نادي الروبوتات على مهارة الإبداع والموقف العلمي لطلاب الصف الثامن في مدرسة تقع في بيروت"، بإشراف: البروفيسور إبراهيم الكبي. متخصصة في تكنولوجيا التعليم ومدربة معتمدة في الذكاء الاصطناعي والروبوتات، وقد أنجزت دورات في الذكاء الاصطناعي من STEMPEDIA وCoursera، بالإضافة إلى تصميم الجرافيك وإنتاج الفيديو. معلمة أحياء، ومدربة معلمين ويافعين في مجال STEAM، وتتمتع بخبرة في دمج التكنولوجيا والذكاء الاصطناعي في التعليم، ومهارات في التواصل، وتصميم المشاريع التعليمية التفاعلية. شاركت في مؤتمرات محلية وعالمية، منها: مؤتمر حول تأثير التحول الرقمي في الإدارة الحديثة، ومؤتمر المرأة العربية والطفل العربي، كما شاركت في "ويبينار" حول تأثير الذكاء الاصطناعي في التعليم العالي مع Erasmus Plus، وورش عمل حول تطبيقات الذكاء الاصطناعي في التعليم، ومشاريع تربوية باستخدام أدوات تكنولوجية متعددة.
* Batoul Ibrahim Salameh: A Lebanese researcher. She holds a Research Master’s degree in Educational Technology from the Faculty of Pedagogy at the Lebanese University. The topic of her thesis was: "The Effect of a Robotics Club on Creativity Skills and the Scientific Attitude of Eighth Grade Students in a School Located in Beirut," supervised by Professor Ibrahim El Kibbi. She is specialized in educational technology and is a certified trainer in artificial intelligence and robotics. She has completed AI courses from STEMPEDIA and Coursera, in addition to training in graphic design and video production. She is a biology teacher, and a trainer of teachers and youth in the field of STEAM. She has experience in integrating technology and artificial intelligence into education, as well as skills in communication and designing interactive educational projects
She has participated in local and international conferences, including: a conference on the impact of digital transformation on modern management, the Arab Woman and Arab Child Conference, a webinar on the impact of artificial intelligence in higher education with Erasmus Plus, workshops on AI applications in education, and educational projects using various technological tools.
*
References
− AGiRepair. (2021). The Evolution of Technology in the Classroom. https://agirepair.com/evolution-of-technology-in-theclassroom/#:~:text=The%20first%20technology%20in%20the,1930%3A%20Overhea d%20projector%20introduced
− Albaneen Jamali, U. (2023). Developing Creativity via LEGO and AI Robotics. Intech Open. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110277.
− Al-Bataineh, A., Anderson, S., Toledo, C. and Wellinski, S. (2008). A study of technology integration in the classroom. Int’l Journal of Instuctional Media. 35.381-387.
− Almekhlafi, A. G. and Almeqdadi, F. A. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in the United Arab Emirates shool classrooms. Educational Technology and Society. 12. 165-175.
− Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological review.106(3). 529–550. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529
− Ataha U.C. & Ogumogu A.E. (2013). An Investigation of The Scientific Attitude Among Science Students In Senior Secondary Schools In Edo South Senatorial District, Edo State. Journal of Education and Practice. 4(11).
− Badeleh, Alireza. (2021). The effects of robotics training on students’ creativity and learning in physics. Education and Information Technologies. 26. 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-019-09972-6.
− Baron, F. and Harrington, D.M. (1981) Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255.
− Boyce, C. & Neale, P. (2006) “Conducting in-depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews”. Pathfinder International Tool Series.
− Brooks, T.. (2011). Effects of Single-Gender Middle School Classes on Science Achievement and Attitude. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Walden University, Minneapolis, MA (USA).
− Brush, T., Glazewski, K. D. and Hew, K. F. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure preservice teachers’ technology skills, technology beliefs, and technology barriers. Computers in the Schools. 25. 112-125.
− Çakır, N. Ç. (2012). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin bilimin doğasına ilişkin görüşleri ve bilimsel tutum ile fen özyeterlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Kütahya örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). UĢak Üniversitesi, UĢak.
− Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. and Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology and Society, 13, 63-73.
− Demirbilek, M. & Keser, S. (2022). Leadership expectations of Generation Z teachers working in educational organizations. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 7(1), 209-245.
− DeVille. (2023). Exploring Gen Z’s Innovative Approaches to Learning. https://stemeducationguide.com/exploring-gen-zs-learning
− Dogan, A., & Kahraman, E. (2021). The effect of STEM activities on the scientific creativity ofmiddle school students. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2),1241-1266.
− Duran, M. (2008). The impact on students' attitudes toward science-based approach to learning science process skills in science teaching. Master thesis, Muğla University.
− Edifyworld. (2022). Importance of Science Education in Schools.
− Elgarf, M. 2022. Child-Robot Behavioral Alignment and Creativity Performance. Doctoral Thesis in Computer Science and Robotics. KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Stockholm, Sweden. portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1695103/FULLTEXT01.pdf
− Fu, S. J. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2013, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 112-125
− Ghandour, S. (2016). The Impact of Educational Robotics on the Attitude of Secondary and Intermediate Students Towards Physical Science and Mathematics. Master’s thesis. Faculty of pedagogy, Lebanese University. Glaubke, C. R. (2007). The effects of interactive media on preschoolers’ learning: A review of the research and recommendations for the future. Oakland, CA: Children. www.childrennow.org/uploads/documents/prek_interactive_learning_2007. pdf
− Hacieminoglu, E.. (2016). Elementary school students' attitude toward science and related variables. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 11. 35–52. DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.288a
− Hadiati, S., Kuswanto, H., Rosana, D., & Pramuda, A. (2019). The Effect of Laboratory Work Style and Reasoning with Arduino to Improve Scientific Attitude. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 321-336. DOI: 10.29333/iji.2019.12221a
− Hampton, D. C., & Keys, Y. (2017). Generation Z Students: Will They Change Our Nursing Classrooms? Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 7 (4). 111 - 115.
− Hou, H. & Zhang, X. & Wang, D. (2022). Can Educational Robots Improve Student Creativity: A Meta-analysis based on 48 Experimental and Quasi-experimental Studies. Best Evidence in Chinese Education. 11. 1449-1454. DOI: 10.15354/bece.22.ab001.
− Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education. 24(4). 389-403.
− Hutchison, A. and Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: a national survey in the United States, Reading Research Quarterly. 46. 312-333.
− Juntarangsu, J; Kusonwatthana, T. (2020). Needs for 21st Century Skills Development among Generation Z: A Case Study at Naresuan University International College. International Journal of Education and Research. 8(1).
− Kadayıfçı, H. (2008). Teaching model based on creative thinking for students to understand the concepts related to the separation of the mass and its effect on scientific creativity. PhD thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
− Khan, M., & Siddiqui, M. A. (2020). Examining scientific attitude scales in India: Development and validation of a new scale. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(4), e2223. DOI: 10.29333/ijese/8557
− Koc, M. (2005). Implications of learning theories for effective technology integration and preservice teacher training: A critical literature review, Journal of Turkish Science Education,2 .2-18
− Büyük, U. & Koç, A. (2021). Effect of Robotics Technology in Science Education on Scientific Creativity and Attitude Development. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 18. 54-72. DOI: 10.36681/tused.2021.52.
− Korkmaz, Ö. (2018). The effect of scratch-and lego mindstorms Ev3-Based programming activities on academic achievement, problem-solving skills and logical-mathematical thinking skills of students. (2018). MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 4(3). 73-88.
− Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM Ahead: The Benefits of Integrating the Arts Into STEM. Procedia Computer Science. 20. 547–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.09.317
− Levin, T. and Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 39, pp.417-441.
− Mao, P., Cai, Z., He, J. & Chen, X. and Fan, X. (2021). The Relationship Between Attitude Toward Science and Academic Achievement in Science: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784068
− Mosca, J. B., Curtis, K. P., & Savoth, P. G. (2019). New approaches to learning for Generation Z. J. Bus. Divers., 19(3), 66–74.
− Nickolaus, K. (2024). Diving Into My First Robotics Competition. Crims on education. https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/diving-into-robotics
− Office of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform (OMSAR). (2022). Lebanon Digital Transformation Strategy 2020-2030.
− Pellegrino, J., & Hilton, M. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Research Council fo the National Academies. doi:10.17226/13398.
− Pitafi AI, Farooq M (2012). Measurement of Scientific Attitude of Secondary School Students in Pakistan. J. Academic Res. Int., 2(2): 379-392.
− Prachagool, V., & Arsaiboon, C. (2021). Scientific attitudes of young children through literature-based and projectbased learning organization. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(3), 288-294. DOI: 10.22219/ jpbi.v7i3.16646
− Runco, M. A., and Acar, S. (2010). Do tests of divergent thinking have an experiential bias? Psychology of Aesthetics, doi:10.1037/a0018969
− Sak, U., & Ayas M. B. (2013). Creative scientific ability test (C-SAT): A new measure of scientific creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(3). 315-328.
− Siew, N. M., Chong, C. L., & Lee, B. N. (2015). Fostering fifth graders’ scientific creativitythrough problem-based learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(5), 655-669. DOI: 10.33225/jbse/15.14.655
− Stencel, J. (1995). A string teacher. The American Biology Teacher, 57(1), 42–45.
− Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
− Sullivan, F., R. (2017). The creative nature of robotics activity: Design and problem solving. Switzerland: Springer.
− Suyana, I., Nadaipah, S., Sinaga, P., & Feranie, S. (2019). Constructing Essay Questions To Assess Scientific Creative And Critical Thinking Simultaneously Related To Collision Problem Based On Students Responses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1204, 012048.
− Tiryaki, A. & Adıgüzel, S. (2021). The Effect of STEM-Based Robotic Applications on the Creativity And Attitude of Students. Journal of Science Learning. 4. 288-297. DOI:10.17509/jsl.v4i3.29683.
− Tiryaki, A., Çakıroğlu, O., & Yaman, Y. (2019). The effects of the program including differentiated stem applications based on the parallel curriculum model on the critical thinking skills, creativity and attitudes of gifted and talented students. International Journal of Science and Research. 8(4). 1226-1230.
− Tiwari, A. & Pathak, K. H. (2022). A meta-analytic review on scientific attitude of teachers and prospective teachers. Int J Appl Res. 8(7): 42-45.
− University of Massachusetts Global. (2023). https://www.umassglobal.edu/news-and events/blog/generation-z-traits-teachers-need-to-adapt-to
− Wang, C.L. & Liou, P.Y. (2017). Students’ motivational beliefs in science learning, school motivational contexts, and science achievement in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education. 39. 1-20. 10.1080/09500693.2017.1310410
− Welch, A. & Huffman, D. (2011). The Effect of Robotics Competitions on High School Students' Attitudes Toward Science. School science and mathematics. 111(8), 416-424.
− Wright, M.C.; Nichols, T. (2021). Innovative Approaches for Teaching Generation Z. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 32(1). 5-22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1310590
− Yildirim, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: A review of teachers’ ICT use and barriers to integration, International Journal of Instructional Media, 34. 171-186.
− Yıldız Taşdemir, C. (2021). Is Scientific Creativity Possible in Early Childhood? Theory and Practice in Child Development. 1(1). 71-82. DOI: 10.46303/tpicd.2021.6
- Zulaichah, S., Sukarmin, S., & Masykuri, M. (2020). Student Scientific Creativity Profile Based on Scientific Structure Creativity Model. 198-205. ICE. DOI: 10.4108/eai.28-9-2019.2291015
***
الحداثة (Al Hadatha)
ربيع 2025 Spring
العدد: 235 ISSUE
مجلد: 32 .Vol
ISSN: 2790-1785
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق