Saoussan Mohamad El Najjar *
نبذة عن البحث باللغة العربية - Abstract:
التفكير المنظومي في الفن والعمارة:
منظور متعدد التخصصات للنظرية والمنهج والتطبيق
يعالج هذا البحث التطوّر التاريخي والأسس النظريّة والتطبيقات المعاصرة للتفكير المنظوميّ (Systems Thinking) في مجالَي الفنّ والعمارة. ويعتمد على تحليل شامل للأدبيَّات العلميّة والنصوص النظريّة والمشروعات التصميميّة الموثّقة، لتتبّع أثر مفاهيم نظريّة النُّظُم (Systems Theory) والسيبرنطيقا (Cybernetics) وعلوم التعقيد (Complexity Sciences) على الممارسات الإبداعيّة منذ منتصف القرن العشرين وحتّى الوقت الحاضر.
كما يستعرض البحث كيفيّة دمج التفكير المنظوميّ في عمليَّات التصميم والتخطيط الحضريّ واستراتيجيّات الاستدامة والحلول المعماريّة التكيفيّة، مبرزًا التحوّل من الأشكال الثابتة إلى الأطر الديناميكيّة المترابطة.
منهجيًّا، يعتمد البحث مقاربة تحليليّة مبنيّة على مراجعة الأدبيَّات، تجمع بين معارف العمارة، ونظريّة التصميم، والدراسات البيئيّة، وأبحاث التعقيد. وتُظهر النتائج أنَّ التفكير المنظوميّ يعزّز منهجيَّات شموليّة وتكيفيّة وتشاركيّة في الممارسة الإبداعيّة، مما يمكّن المصمّمين والمعماريّين من الاستجابة الفعَّالة للتحدّيات البيئيّة والتطوّرات التقنيّة والاحتياجات الإنسانيّة المتغيّرة. وتشير آفاق البحث المستقبليّة إلى أهمّيّة تعميق التعاون العابر للتخصّصات (Transdisciplinary)، وتطوير مناهج تعليميّة قائمة على النُّظُم في مجالات التصميم، وتعزيز استخدام الأدوات الحاسوبيّة، والمعتمدة على البيانات لدعم الإبداع الموجّه بالنّظُم.
- الكلمات المفتاحية:
التفكير المنظوميّ؛ الفنّ؛ العمارة؛ نظريّة النُّظُم؛ السيبرنطيقا؛ علم التعقيد؛ التصميم التكيّفيّ؛ التخطيط الحضريّ
***
- Abstract:
This study explores the historical evolution, theoretical foundations, and contemporary applications of systems thinking in the fields of art and architecture. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of scholarly literature, theoretical treatises, and documented design projects, the study traces how concepts from systems theory, cybernetics, and complexity science have influenced creative disciplines from the mid-20th century to the present. It examines the integration of systems thinking into design processes, urban planning, sustainability strategies, and adaptive architectural solutions, highlighting the shift from static forms to dynamic, interconnected frameworks. Methodologically, the article employs a literature-based approach, synthesizing insights from architecture, design theory, ecological studies, and complexity research. The findings reveal that systems thinking fosters holistic, adaptive, and participatory approaches to creative practice, enabling responses to environmental challenges, technological change, and evolving human needs. Future research directions include deeper exploration of transdisciplinary collaborations, development of systems-based pedagogies in design education, and the advancement of computational and data-driven tools to enhance systems-oriented creativity.
- Keywords:
systems thinking; art; architecture; systems theory; cybernetics; complexity science; adaptive design; sustainability; urban planning
***
* د. سوسن محمد النجَّار: باحثة وأكاديمية لبنانيّة. محاضرة في كليّة الفنون الجميلة والعمارة - الجامعة اللبنانيّة. حائزة شهادة دكتوراه في اللغات والحضارات والمجتمعات الشرقيّة في جامعة السوريون الثالثة - باريس Paris III (فرع الآداب العربيّة).
* Dr. Saoussan Mohamad El- Najjar: Ph.D. in Oriental Languages, Civilizations and Societies- Arabic Literature Branch - Faculty of Fine Arts and Architecture - Lebanese University
References
- Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 341–343.
- Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press.
- Ascott, R. (2003). Telematic embrace: Visionary theories of art, technology, and consciousness. University of California Press.
- Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of Self-Organization. In H. von Foerster & G. W. Zopf Jr. (Eds.), Principles of Self-Organization (pp. 255–278). U.S. Office of Naval Research.
- Batty, M. (2005). Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. MIT Press.
- Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. MIT Press.
- Benyus, J. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. Harper Perennial.
- Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller, INC.
- Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso Books.
- Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (2010). Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan.
- Burnham, J. (1968). Systems esthetics. Artforum, 7(1), 30–35.
- Burry, M., & Burry, J. (2016). Prototyping for architects. Thames & Hudson.
- Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts: Foundations and futures from the frontline. Leonardo, 51(1), 63–69.
- Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life. Anchor Books.
- Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press.
- Chantzaras, C. (2019). Architecture as a system and innovation design discipline. FormAkademisk: Research Journal of Design and Design Education, Vol. 12(2), Art. 5, 1–17.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Springer.
- Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors (2nd ed.). Wiley.
- Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive architecture. AD Architectural Design, 79(2), 74–81.
- Galanter, P. (2003). What is generative art? Complexity theory as a context for art theory. In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Art Conference. Milan, Italy.
- Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
- Harrison, C., & Donnelly, I. A. (2011). A theory of smart cities. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, 55(1), 1–15.
- Hauser, J., Del Val, J., & Keller, E. F. (2015). Artistic research in the context of synthetic biology. Leonardo, 48(5), 435–442.
- Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229–246.
- Jonas, W. (2007). Design research and its meaning to the methodological development of the discipline. In R. Michel (Ed.), Design research now (pp. 187–206). Birkhäuser.
- Jones, P. H. (2014). Design for care: Innovating healthcare experience. Rosenfeld Media.
- Kararmaz, O. & Serter C. P. (2023). From Dots and Lines to Connections: Re-Evaluation of Relational Thinking in Architecture.). Buildings, 13(14), 2548.
- Kolarevic, B., & Parlac, V. (2015). Responsive architecture: Performing instruments. Routledge.
- Lin, Z. (2010). Kenzo Tange and the Metabolist movement: Urban utopias of modern Japan. Routledge.
- Louise, St. P. (2019). Design and Nature: A History. Design and Nature: A Partnership (pp. 93–108).
- Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2012). Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 23–38.
- Mang, P., & Haggard, B. (2016). Regenerative development and design: A framework for evolving sustainability. Wiley.
- Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
- Myers, W. (2018). Bio design: Nature + science + creativity. Museum of Modern Art, MoMa Books.
- Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
- Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1977). Self-organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order Through Fluctuations. Wiley.
- Oxman, R. (2006). Theory and design in the first digital age. Design Studies, 27(3), 229–265.
- Oxman, N. (2016). Age of entanglement. Journal of Design and Science. https://doi.org/10.21428/7f2e5f08
- Pask, G. (1969). The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics. Architectural Design Magazine. Wiley, 7/6, 496-496.
- Pask, G. (1971). A comment, a case history and a plan. In J. Reichardt (Ed.), Cybernetics, art and ideas (pp. 76–99). Studio Vista.
- Portugali, J. (2011). Complexity, cognition and the city. Springer.
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
- Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. ed.). Currency/Doubleday.
- Senge, P. M., & Sterman, J. D. (2008). Systems thinking. In W. B. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Wiley.
- Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
- Shrubsole, C. (2018). Systems thinking in the built environment: Seeing the bigger picture, understanding the detail. Indoor and Built Environment, 27(4): 439-441.
- Von Foerster, H. (1960). On Self-Organizing Systems and Their Environments. In M. C. Yovits & S. Cameron (Eds.), Self-Organizing Systems (pp. 31–50). Pergamon Press.
- Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
- Woodbury, R. (2010). Elements of parametric design. Routledge.
Yaneva, A. (2009). Made by the office for metropolitan architecture: An ethnography of design. 010 Publishers.
الحداثة (Al Hadatha)
ربيع 2026 Spring
العدد: 239 ISSUE
مجلد: 33 .Vol
ISSN: 2790-1785
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق